‘Flaw’ and ‘floor’

October 26, 2015October 27, 2015Hannah McCall 4 Comments

Flaw:

an imperfection, mark or blemish
a mistake or shortcoming in something that makes it invalid, causes it to fail, or reduces its effectiveness
a fault or weakness in a person’s character.

Floor:

the lower surface of a room
a storey of a building (rooms or areas on the same level)
a flat bottom surface
a minimum limit or level
the part of a legislative hall in which members sit and debate is conducted
the large central hall where trading takes place in a Stock Exchange
to provide a room/area with a floor (or as an adjective e.g. ‘a marble-floored room’)
to have the right to speak in a debate or discussion – ‘have the floor’
to disconcert, baffle or defeat; to knock someone to the ground.

Grandiloquent

October 23, 2015March 16, 2016Hannah McCall 2 Comments

Grandiloquent is usually considered an autological word.

It means pompous, lofty or extravagant in language, style or manner, especially in a way that is intended to impress or attract admiration.

The word’s origin is late 16th century. It stems from the Latin grandiloquus, meaning ‘grand-speaking’. The association with eloquent has altered the ending in English.

Magniloquent is considered a synonym of grandiloquent. And they rhyme.

Split infinitives

October 21, 2015March 16, 2016Hannah McCall 9 Comments

An infinitive is the form of a verb made by adding to to its stem (e.g. to go or to do).

It is often argued that there should never be anything between the to and the stem. In Latin, the infinitive is a single word. This has led to the belief that the infinitive in English should be treated as a single unified concept, and that it is bad grammar to separate the two parts.

It is not bad grammar to split an infinitive; there is no grammatical reason not to. It is sometimes impossible to convey your meaning without splitting the infinitive. Sentences quite often read better when the infinitive has been split.

The most famous example of a split infinitive is probably to boldly go (from Star Trek). Would to go boldly or boldly to go have the same emphasis? No. Are they more natural? No.

As with ending a sentence with a preposition, there are circumstances where it would be more appropriate to avoid splitting the infinitive. It might be, for instance, jarring to split it.

You may also find that some publications would rather that you didn’t split infinitives lest you upset people by doing so. For that reason, The Economist’s Style Guide sadly declares that the ban on split infinitives is ‘pointless’ but that you should observe it anyway.

I’m not sure how healthy it is to obey a ‘rule’ that isn’t a rule just to keep your readers from confronting that it isn’t a rule.

If you want to read people agree with me, here are some books you should take a look at:

For Who the Bell Tolls: One Man’s Quest for Grammatical Perfection, David Marsh.
Fowler’s Dictionary of Modern English Usage, Jeremy Butterfield (editor).*
Oxford A–Z of Grammar and Punctuation (Second Edition), John Seely.
Oxford Guide to Plain English (Fourth Edition), Martin Cutts.
The Chicago Manual of Style (Sixteenth Edition).
The Penguin Writer’s Manual, Martin Manser and Stephen Curtis.

* Fowler’s suggests that you should avoid splitting infinitives but also states that it is acceptable and often necessary.

(To make things even more complicated, I recommend Trask’s The Penguin Dictionary of English Grammar for an explanation of why you aren’t actually splitting an infinitive at all.)

Thank you to Lucy aka Blondeusk for suggesting this post.

‘Whine’ and ‘wine’

October 19, 2015October 20, 2015Hannah McCall 8 Comments

I bring you more homophones.

Whine:

a long, high-pitched plaintive cry; a long, high-pitched unpleasant sound
to issue a long, high-pitched cry or sound
a petulant complaint
to whinge or complain.

Wine:

an alcoholic drink produced by the fermenting of grapes (usually with sugar and water)
an alcoholic drink produced by the fermenting of other fruits and flowers (usually with sugar and water)
a dark purplish-red colour.

You can wine and dine someone by offering them (usually lavish) drinks and a meal, or you can wine and dine as you enjoy yourself by eating and drinking.

Thank you to Jeff Curry for suggesting this post.

Pooh-bah

October 16, 2015March 16, 2016Hannah McCall 1 Comment

A pooh-bah is a person who has a lot of power and/or influence. They may hold (but not necessarily fulfill) many offices at the same time, and they are often seen as pompous or self-important.

The word originates from a character in W. S. Gilbert’s The Mikado (1885). In the opera, Pooh-Bah bears the title ‘Lord High Everything Else’; his behaviour matches the definition above.

Follow @proofreaderhan

‘Its’ and ‘it’s’

October 14, 2015March 16, 2016Hannah McCall 15 Comments

When I am proofreading, I often find that it’s is used when its would be correct. I think that this occurs because the writer is thinking about apostrophes as a way to show possession. However, its is a possessive pronoun. It doesn’t need an apostrophe because it is already the possessive form of it.

Its means ‘belonging to it’.

It’s means ‘it is’ or ‘it has’.

The following are also possessives and don’t require an apostrophe: hers, his, mine, yours, theirs and ours.

‘Tire’ and ‘tyre’

October 12, 2015March 16, 2016Hannah McCall 1 Comment

In British English, these are the spellings for two words with different meanings.

Tire:

to reduce the energy of (usually by exertion); to feel or cause to feel in need of sleep/rest
to become bored with or lose interest in something; to exhaust the patience of.

Tyre:

a ring of rubber fitted round the rim of a wheel of a road vehicle to form a soft contact with the road
a band of metal fitted round the rim of a wheel (typically of a railway vehicle).

In American English, tire is the standard spelling for both meanings. Tyre is actually thought to be a variant of the old form tire (a shortening of attire because the tyre was seen as the ‘clothing’ of the wheel).

Thank you to Aeryn Rudel for suggesting this post.

50th post!

October 11, 2015March 16, 2016Hannah McCall 16 Comments

This is my 50th post on proofreaderhannah.com!

Thank you for following my blog. Thank you for your kind and interesting comments. Thank you for liking my posts. Thank you for your emails and tweets.

I hope that my posts have been helpful and at least a little bit interesting; I have certainly enjoyed reading your blogs.

If you have any content or topics you would like to suggest for future posts, please let me know.

To show my appreciation, I would like to offer all of my followers 20% off the total fee for the first project I work on with them. All you have to do is follow me on WordPress, follow me on Twitter, or like my page on Facebook. Please tell me that you follow me when you request a project quote.

You can follow me on twitter here: Follow @proofreaderhan

You can like my page on Facebook here: Hannah McCall – Proofreader

Once again, thank you. You are all wonderful.

Sesquipedalian

October 9, 2015March 16, 2016Hannah McCall 12 Comments

Here’s a new type of interesting word for this blog – a word that is autological. Autological words are members of or have features of the category they describe. They have or represent the property they denote.

Sesquipedalian means ‘having many syllables’. It can also be used to describe something as given to using long words or being long-winded.

Its origin is mid 17th century, from the Latin sesquipedalis meaning ‘a foot and a half long’.

Follow @proofreaderhan

Are you on tenderhooks?

October 7, 2015March 16, 2016Hannah McCall 5 Comments

No, but you might be on tenterhooks.

If you are on tenterhooks, you are in a state of suspense or agitation because of uncertainty about an event in the future.

Tenterhooks were hooks that held cloth firmly in place on tenters. Tenters were wooden frames used to stretch cloth after it had been milled. They were used so that cloth dried evenly and didn’t shrink.

The first usage of tenterhooks in the sense of suspense can be found in Tobias Smollett’s novel The Adventures of Roderick Random, published in 1748: “I made no reply, but left him upon the tenter-hooks of impatient uncertainty.”